Rejected Wrong Decision | Zeeshan Daku

Status
Not open for further replies.
Your Nick-Name
Tommy Vice

Administrator Nick-Name
Zeeshan Daku
Date
Mar 18, 2025
Time
04:03 PM PST time
Proof
Thread 'BUG ABUSE, GH 1.6 | Tommy Vice' https://forum.rpgrand.com/threads/4872/ . Thread 'GH 1.6 | Tommy Vice' https://forum.rpgrand.com/threads/4717/

Tommy Vice

Leader of Liberty
Player
Dear Chief,
I hope you are doing well.


I would like to bring to your attention a concern regarding a decision made by Zeeshan Daku. Ansh Seghal, the leader of Inferno, submitted two forum complaints against me for GH 1.6. I already received punishment once, and yet, Zeeshan Sir approved another complaint for GH 1.6, which I accept as valid because I did break the rule twice.


However, the issue arises with the GR 1.20 penalty. I was penalized for GR 1.20 without any forum complaint against me regarding this rule. Additionally, the initial issue with GH 1.6 stemmed from the fact that we were not clearly recognizing the correct blue trousers for Liberty’s uniform. After receiving the first warning, I consulted with the Liberty curator, who then clarified the correct trousers.



Given these circumstances, I believe the GR 1.20 punishment was unfair, as there was no proper complaint on the forum against me for this rule. I kindly request a reconsideration of this decision.


Best regards,
Leader of Liberty
 
Dear Chief,
I hope you are doing well.


I would like to bring to your attention a concern regarding a decision made by Zeeshan Daku. Ansh Seghal, the leader of Inferno, submitted two forum complaints against me for GH 1.6. I already received punishment once, and yet, Zeeshan Sir approved another complaint for GH 1.6, which I accept as valid because I did break the rule twice.


However, the issue arises with the GR 1.20 penalty. I was penalized for GR 1.20 without any forum complaint against me regarding this rule. Additionally, the initial issue with GH 1.6 stemmed from the fact that we were not clearly recognizing the correct blue trousers for Liberty’s uniform. After receiving the first warning, I consulted with the Liberty curator, who then clarified the correct trousers.



Given these circumstances, I believe the GR 1.20 punishment was unfair, as there was no proper complaint on the forum against me for this rule. I kindly request a reconsideration of this decision.


Best regards,
Leader of Liberty
Sir, sorry for the rule writing mistake. I mistakenly wrote 1.20, but the correct rule is 6.20.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top